You cannot log in to the systems holding you. You can make them answer. Below: the opt-out destinations that actually matter, a letter that forces disclosure of inferred attributes, and a report of what you worked out here. All of it stays in your browser.
Every link goes to the company's own opt-out or privacy page. Do the hubs and registries first — they cover many companies at once. The people-search sites are the grind.
Opt-out forms stop future targeting. A written request is what makes them disclose the file itself — including inferred attributes, which is the part nobody shows you.
Date: 2026-09-20 To: Privacy Officer, Acxiom / LiveRamp (Acxiom data) Subject: Data subject request — [your full name] To whom it may concern, I am a data subject exercising my rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (Cal. Civ. Code §1798.100 et seq.), including my rights to know, to delete, and to opt out of the sale or sharing of my personal information. My details for identification: Full name: [your full name] Email: [your email address] Location: [your city, state/province, country] I request, first, a complete copy of all personal information you hold about me — including inferred and derived attributes, audience segments and scores I have been assigned, the categories of sources it came from, and the specific third parties you have disclosed, sold or shared it with — and second, following that disclosure, the deletion of that information and an end to any sale or sharing of it. Where information about me was inferred or modelled rather than collected directly, please include the inference itself and a description of the logic used to produce it. Where you cannot fulfil part of this request, please state the specific legal basis for that refusal. Please respond within 45 days of receipt, as required. I do not consent to my personal information being used to create new profiles or segments in the course of handling this request, and I ask that you retain only what is strictly necessary to process it. Please confirm receipt of this request in writing. Sincerely, [your full name] [your email address]
If you are Canadian, the reclaim list above is shorter than the American one. That is not an oversight in this page — it reflects a real hole in Canadian law. Six reasons, each with what exists somewhere else and what we have instead.
elsewhere: California, Vermont, Texas and Oregon require data brokers to register publicly, and California's DELETE Act builds a single request that hits every registered broker at once.
canada: Canada has no registry at any level of government. There is no public list of who is brokering Canadians' data.
what it costs you: You cannot send a request to a broker you cannot name. Reclaiming your file means guessing at companies one at a time.
Opt-outs work one company at a time. A registry and a one-stop deletion right would work for everyone at once — and that only comes from Parliament. Find your MP and riding at ourcommons.ca, pick your asks, then send it by email or on paper (postage-free to the House of Commons).
September 20, 2026 [your full name] [your street address, city, province, postal code] [your MP's name], MP Constituency of [your riding] House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 Dear [your MP's name], I am a constituent in [your riding], and I am writing about Canada's lack of protection against the trade in personal data. Information about Canadians is inferred, scored, packaged into audience segments and sold every day by companies we cannot name and have never dealt with. In California a resident can look up every registered data broker and send one deletion request that reaches all of them. In the European Union a person can demand the logic behind an automated inference about them. In Canada there is no registry, no one-stop deletion, no statutory definition of inferred data, and a Privacy Commissioner who can recommend but not order. PIPEDA was written in 2000, before the industry that now profiles us existed, and both attempts to replace it — Bill C-11 and Bill C-27 — died before passage. I am asking you to support, and to press your caucus and the responsible Minister to advance, the following: 1. Establish a mandatory public registry of data brokers operating in Canada, modelled on California's registry, so that Canadians can see who holds and trades information about them. 2. Create a single, free deletion mechanism — comparable to California's DELETE Act — that transmits one verified request from a Canadian to every registered broker, rather than requiring dozens of separate letters. 3. Amend federal privacy law to state explicitly that inferred, derived and modelled attributes — audience segments, propensity scores, sensitive-category predictions — are personal information, and that individuals have a right to see them and to know the logic that produced them. 4. Give the Privacy Commissioner of Canada binding order-making power and the ability to levy administrative monetary penalties, so that findings are enforceable rather than advisory. 5. Extend Québec's Law 25 approach nationally: require organisations to notify individuals when a decision about them is made by automated processing, and to explain the personal information and principal factors used. 6. Prohibit the sale or licensing of inferred health, financial-hardship, immigration-status and precise-location attributes about identifiable Canadians, regardless of whether the underlying data was collected with consent. 7. Reintroduce consumer privacy reform in this Parliament and see it through. Canadians have now watched two consecutive bills die before passage while the industry consolidated. I would like to know your position on each of these points, and whether you will raise data broker accountability with the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry. I would appreciate a written reply. Thank you for your time and for your work on behalf of this riding. Sincerely, [your full name] [your street address, city, province, postal code]
The famous "your data is worth a few cents" line is about what you could sell it for. This is the other number: what the industry makes from having it.
Everything you assembled on this page, in one document: claimed behaviors, the documented segments they map to, the value, and the worklist. Attach it to a request letter, or keep it.
AGENT ALICE CHAOS — PERSONAL INFERENCE REPORT generated 2026-09-20 · assembled locally in your browser 1. WHAT YOU TOLD THIS PAGE (no behaviors selected) age band: 25 – 34 household income: $35k – $75k region: United States 2. DOCUMENTED SEGMENTS THIS PUTS YOU IN (0 of 30) (none — select behaviors to populate) 3. ESTIMATED VALUE TO THE ECOSYSTEM your impression CPM: $3.78 (untargeted floor $2.80) broker file price per sale: $0.07 ad revenue you generate per year: $15.12 ecosystem lifetime value: $154 estimates keyed to public rate cards and reported CPM benchmarks — not invoices. 4. WHAT TO DO NEXT [ ] Acxiom / LiveRamp (Acxiom data) — https://isapps.acxiom.com/optout/optout.aspx [ ] LiveRamp identity graph — https://liveramp.com/opt_out/ [ ] Oracle Advertising (BlueKai / Datalogix legacy) — https://www.oracle.com/legal/privacy/marketing-cloud-data-cloud-privacy-policy.html [ ] Epsilon (Publicis) — https://www.epsilon.com/us/privacy-policy [ ] Experian Marketing Services (Mosaic) — https://www.experian.com/privacy/opting_out [ ] Equifax / IXI wealth data — https://www.equifax.com/personal/privacy/ [ ] TransUnion TLOxp — https://www.transunion.com/consumer-privacy [ ] Spokeo — https://www.spokeo.com/optout [ ] Whitepages — https://www.whitepages.com/suppression-requests [ ] BeenVerified — https://www.beenverified.com/app/optout/search [ ] Radaris — https://radaris.com/control/privacy [ ] NAI consumer opt-out — https://optout.networkadvertising.org/ [ ] DAA WebChoices / AppChoices — https://optout.aboutads.info/ [ ] Global Privacy Control — https://globalprivacycontrol.org/ [ ] California DELETE Act registry (DROP) — https://cppa.ca.gov/data_broker_registry/ [ ] Vermont data broker registry — https://bizfilings.vermont.gov/online/DatabrokerInquire/ [ ] Canadian Marketing Association — Do Not Contact — https://thecma.ca/consumers/do-not-contact-service [ ] AdChoices Canada (DAAC / youradchoices.ca) — https://youradchoices.ca/en/tools [ ] Canada Post — Consumers' Choice (unaddressed admail) — https://www.canadapost-postescanada.ca/cpc/en/support/kb/receiving/mail-delivery/consumers-choice-service [ ] Equifax Canada — marketing opt-out — https://www.consumer.equifax.ca/personal/help/opt-out-prescreened-offers/ [ ] TransUnion Canada — marketing opt-out — https://www.transunion.ca/legal/privacy-and-security [ ] Environics Analytics (PRIZM Canada) — https://environicsanalytics.com/en-ca/privacy-policy [ ] Canada411 / Yellow Pages listings — https://www.canada411.ca/privacy/ [ ] Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada — complaint — https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/report-a-concern/ [ ] Commission d'accès à l'information (Québec, Law 25) — https://www.cai.gouv.qc.ca/ Nothing in this report was transmitted or stored. It exists only because you generated it.
Opting out narrows the file. Alice's protocols make it wrong.